With the emergence of DeepSeek in the generative AI market, the competition is intensifying. Just a few days later, OpenAI responds with a new free version of ChatGPT, incorporating advanced reasoning capabilities, a feature that had captivated DeepSeek. The battle for supremacy in the field of artificial intelligence has just begun and promises to redefine the boundaries of what is possible.
DeepSeek R1 vs ChatGPT o3 Mini: Which is better?
In various tests between DeepSeek R1 and the paid version of ChatGPT o3 Mini (ChatGPT o3 High), the following results were obtained:
1.- Reasoning Speed
The new version of ChatGPT shows greater speed in reasoning and complex thinking in areas such as mathematics, programming, and science. According to various tests, in some cases, this speed surpasses that of DeepSeek, while in others, the opposite is true. In evaluations challenging reasoning and problem-solving capabilities, ChatGPT has taken longer in some scenarios than DeepSeek, while in others, it has been faster. Similarly, in numerical and logical challenges, DeepSeek R1 took longer than ChatGPT in certain tests.
2.- Lateral Thinking
When subjected to various numerical challenges, ChatGPT Mini High initially faces greater difficulties in lateral thinking compared to its competitor, DeepSeek.
3.- Context of Responses
OpenAI has not only improved the reasoning of its generative AI and increased processing speed but has also connected responses to its search engine to provide greater context, matching the new competitor, DeepSeek. However, it does not always consider the context to respond correctly. To test which of the two is better in this aspect, both were presented with a problem where the possibility of obtaining a resource through an action in an adverse environment had to be evaluated. When asked, ChatGPT focused on performing the main action without considering that the imposed conditions prevented the resource from being available.
4.- Logic Problems
When consulted on a purely logical problem, both DeepSeek and ChatGPT Mini offered correct solutions.
5.- Identifying Paradoxes
DeepSeek is capable of identifying paradoxes, just like ChatGPT, demonstrating its ability to detect inconsistencies and inherent contradictions in certain statements or problems.
Initial comparisons suggest a tie between the two; however, as these are continuously evolving models, what was an advantage for one yesterday may have been neutralised today.
Which is better?
Both models continue to evolve and improve with each iteration. The competition between DeepSeek R1 and ChatGPT o3 Mini drives developers to constantly optimise their algorithms and reasoning processes, resulting in increasingly accurate and efficient outcomes for the end user. This competitive dynamic not only benefits those seeking complex solutions in mathematics, programming, science, or logic but also enriches the generative AI ecosystem.
The rivalry between the two translates into an innovation race that favours the user, as each update and technological improvement contributes to providing more contextual, faster, and robust responses. Thus, competition in the AI market is nothing more than an opportunity to advance and offer higher-quality tools, paving the way for a future where users will benefit from increasingly sophisticated and tailored solutions.
Want to leverage generative AI to grow your business? At PGR Marketing y Tecnología, we’re here to help you achieve it.
